Bibliographic record
Abstract
This is a second report on issues related to installation of sub meters in residential rental buildings and the impact on housing affordability. The first report was submitted to the Tenant Defence Sub-Committee (the Sub-committee) June 17, 2008. This report provides information about feedback from a consultation with stakeholders on the recommendations made by the Sub-Committee in response to the first report, including landlord groups, tenant groups, housing committees, other City divisions, and provincial ministries and agencies dealing with energy conservation. Input from Toronto Hydro about the Sub-Committee’s recommendations was also included at the request of Community Development and Recreation Committee. This report is not about energy efficiency nor actions that may reduce the environmental impacts of private rental housing. It is not a report about whether sub-metering of rental residential properties is an effective means for energy conservation. Rather, this report is concerned with the issue of a fair transfer of responsibility for payment of utility costs from the landlord to the tenant. Provisions in the Residential Tenancies Act (RTA) governing transfer of hydro costs have not yet been enacted, and concerns have been
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".