Bibliographic record
Abstract
It is fitting for JASO to be publishing a review of the latest edition in the ‘Anthropological Horizons ’ series from the University of Toronto. Not only is it an insightful and scholarly volume, but it is appropriate given the connection between Oxford’s School of Anthropology and the study of the Orang Asli, the indigenous minority of Peninsular Malaysia. Rodney Needham, Kirk Endicott, Hood Salleh and Signe Howell have made significant contributions in this field, all of whom are cited by Dallos in From Equality to Inequality. There is a body of rich ethnography focusing on different groups of Orang Asli, and some readers may have benefitted from a more detailed contextualisation of the community, especially as background to Chapter 2, which explores the ethnic affiliation of the Lanoh with the Senoi or Semang. What is particularly noteworthy throughout, however, is Dallos’s nuanced discussion of Lanoh relations with and perceptions of neighbouring groups, particularly the Temiar. Indeed, Chapter 3 stands as an expert inquiry into intergroup relations and the implications of these before and after Malaysian independence in 1957. Other studies have explored this period in detail from a ‘Malay versus Orang Asli ’ perspective, but few have critically examined how post-independence changes have affected relations between
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".