HILL METAVOLCANIC SUITE OF THE APPALACHIAN FOLD BELT, QUEBEC-VERMONT: A PLUME-RELATED AND FRACTIONATED ASSEMBLAGE
Bibliographic record
Abstract
(THF) covers a large crustal segment exposed along a belt about 250 km long in the Appalachian fold belt (Quebec-Vermont). It is predominantly basaltic in composition but contains a minor component of felsic and intermediate alkaline volcanic lithologies. Geochemically, the Tibbit Hill Formation forms a continuum in composition and exhibits a wide range of SiO2 (44-76 wt. percent), covering the entire spectrum from alkali basalt to trachyte and comendite. This mildly alkaline suite is relatively enriched in incompatible elements and exhibits a wide range of Zr (138-1493 ppm), Nb (15-139 ppm), and Y (18-185 ppm) concentrations, among other elements. The concentrations of the HFSE and the REE gradually increase toward the more evolved lithologies. The chondrite normalized REE patterns are fractionated (LREE-enriched over HREE), parallel to subparallel, and generally uniform but with negative Eu-anomalies developed in the more felsic varieties. These geochemical features underline the comagmatic nature of the entire suite and are consistent with a fractionated basalt to comendite suites. The incompat-
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".