MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7100365469

Published by The Geological Society of London. Publishing disclaimer: www.geolsoc.org.uk/pub_ethics Journal of the Geological Society

2015· article· en· W7100365469 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPlace Attachment and Urban Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIcebergMoraineArchipelagoArcticGlacierIce shelfIce sheetPeriod (music)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Interpreting the dynamics and history of ice shelves is important for evaluating the response of ice sheets to climatic and oceanographic changes. Ice shelves have received considerable attention in the Antarctic Peninsula, as they have undergone sequential, rapid col-lapse (Vaughan & Doake 1996; Morris & Vaughan 2003; Cooke et al. 2005; Cook & Vaughan 2010), following a long period during which their grounding-lines had been stable (Rebesco et al. 2014). A detailed understanding of ice-shelf character and behaviour is therefore of immediate interest, yet the geological record of ice shelves is largely unknown. Geological and structural glaciological data can provide vital information concerning the evolution of ice shelves over time. However, apart from a few examples of moraines produced by floating glacier ice in the Canadian Arctic Archipelago

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.444
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.089
GPT teacher head0.332
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPlace Attachment and Urban StudiesFrench-language works237,207