MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7100367795

1 40,000,000 Shares Thomson Reuters Corporation AMENDED AND RESTATED DIVIDEND REINVESTMENT PLAN

2015· article· en· W7100367795 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicFinancial Reporting and Valuation Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCommon stockDividendProspectusShares outstandingShare priceStock exchangeStock dilutionCash flowCorporation
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This prospectus covers 40,000,000 common shares of Thomson Reuters Corporation issuable under our amended and restated dividend reinvestment plan which provides holders of our common shares with a simple and convenient method of investing cash dividends declared on our common shares in additional common shares of Thomson Reuters Corporation. Under the amended and restated dividend reinvestment plan, holders of our common shares resident in Canada, the United States and the United Kingdom (and certain other eligible jurisdictions) may opt to have any cash dividends declared on their common shares reinvested in newly issued common shares, without paying any brokerage commissions or service charges. The price of the common shares to be issued under the plan is calculated based on the weighted average trading price of our common shares on the Toronto Stock Exchange during the five trading days immediately preceding the record date for each dividend payment. Our common shares are listed on both the New York Stock Exchange and the Toronto Stock Exchange under the symbol “TRI”. On November 23, 2009, the closing price for our common shares on the Toronto Stock Exchange was C$32.96 and the closing price for our common shares on the New York Stock Exchange was US$31.21. We presently pay quarterly dividends on our common shares. The rate at which we pay dividends takes into account all factors that our board considers relevant from the perspective of our company, including our available cash flow, financial condition and capital requirements. Our dividend policy is reviewed annually by the board and the decision to declare dividends is at the discretion of our board.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.795
Threshold uncertainty score0.685

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0050.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2050.246

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.161
GPT teacher head0.317
Teacher spread0.156 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicFinancial Reporting and Valuation ResearchFrench-language works237,207