MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7100378307

Royal Canadian Army Medical Corps CLINICAL FEATURES

2016· article· en· W7100378307 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSarcoidosis and Beryllium Toxicity Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPeriosteumTime lagTime lineTime sequenceFull-timeSecond opinion
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sarcoid of bone (also known as Jungling’s disease and Boeck’s sarcoid) is seen irmost frequently in young adults, particularly in males. Time onset is usually insidious. Time bones of time hands and feet are most commonly affected, but cases imave been reported which involved time long bones. There may be no external evidence of time disease, but usually there is irregular enlargement of time fingers or toes. Subcutaneous nodules may appear about time interphalangeal joints, and in advanced cases timere nmay be gradual disappearance of time terminal phalanges. Pain may be present in time early stages, but it is never severe. Time roentgenographic changes are so cimaracteristic timat timey nmay be easily identified by anyone who is familiar with the disease. Jflngling described three main roentgenographic pictures, altimough internmediate and mixed fornms are common. Type 1 is a diffuse mottling or speckling of time affected bone, sonmetimes simowing slight expansion of time cortex. Type 2 is cimaracterized by a puncimed-out appearance, which gives time impression of translucent cysts in time substance of time bone. These cysts tend to fuse and to form larger cysts, but timey seldoimm involve time periosteum or time joints. Time puncimed-out areas, however, are not cystic in the true sense of time word,

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.347
Threshold uncertainty score0.689

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0040.002
Science and technology studies0.0040.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2010.032

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.386
Teacher spread0.334 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSarcoidosis and Beryllium Toxicity ResearchFrench-language works237,207