MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7100382413

Partition of Platinum, Palladium, Iridium, and Gold among Coexisting Minerals from the Deep Ore Zone, Strathcona

2016· article· en· W7100382413 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPrenatal Screening and Diagnostics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPentlanditePyrrhotiteChalcopyritePalladiumPlatinumSulfideSulfide mineralsIridium
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Platinum, palladium, iridium, and gold were determined by radiochemical neutron activation analysis in coexisting pyrrhotite, pentlandire, chalcopyrite, and magnetite from the deep ore zone of Strathcona mine, Sudbury, Ontario. Platinum and palladium are the most abundant noble metals and their average concentrations reach ppm levels in chalcopyrite and pentlandite, whereas average gold and iridium values do not exceed 15 ppb, except for the gold content of pentlandite which averages 118 ppb. Individual noble metals are strongly associated with specific sulfide minerals. Palladium and gold are concentrated with pentlandite, and platinum and iridium are associated with chalcopyrite. Relative to the most abundant sulfide, pyrrhotite, palladium and gold are concentrated in pentlandite by a factor of approximately 14, and platinum and iridium are concentrated in chalcopyrite by a factor of approximately 6. Except for iridium, mag-netite is depleted in noble metals relative to all sulfide minerals. Using phase relations in the Cu-Fe-Ni-S system as a guide to the paragenesis of the principal sulfide minerals, 4t is suggested that the palladium-pentlandite association is best explained by a solid solution of much of the palladium in pyrrhotite at magmatic tem-peratures with a subsequent exsolution with pentlandite below 300øC. The same process was presumably significant in controlling the gold distribution. Some chalcopyrite probably exsolved from the pyrrhotite solid soluton at sub-solidus temperatures, but the direct precipitation.of chalcopyrite from a copper-rich magmatic liquid is also feasible. The platinum-chalcopyrite association therefore suggests that the platinum distribution is controlled in part by a solid solution in pyrrhotite and in part by fractionation into a copper-rich magmatic liquid. The distribution of platinum values in this Strathcona deep ore zone suite indicates that both processes were operative.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.267
Threshold uncertainty score0.532

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPrenatal Screening and Diagnostics→French-language works237,207→