Bibliographic record
Abstract
A 54 year-old man consults about a long-standing cough: his wife encouraged him to attend as she was tired of hearing him cough all the time. He is a bit vague about when it started, but it must be ‘nearly a year’. He has consulted his usual general practitioner about the cough three times. Eight months ago he presented with a ‘chesty ’ cough associated with a feverish illness and an upper respiratory tract infection; he was prescribed a course of antibiotics which he thinks might have slightly improved the cough, though it did not fully resolve. Two subsequent consultations resulted in a further course of antibiotics and a trial of a salbutamol inhaler, neither of which appear to have made any difference. The clinical notes record that his chest was ‘clear ’ at each of these consultations. He describes himself as ‘generally well’, though he has been tired recently which he attributes to the long hours he is working. He smoked for about 15 years but quit in his mid-thirties. A 54 year-old man with a chronic cough A primary care perspective from Canada
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".