Bibliographic record
Abstract
wish to cite in an article consti- tutes a direct use of memory, whereas fluently using the many features of our word processors without realizing that memory is being tapped is an indirect use of memory. A variety of dissociations in performance have been ob- served between direct and indirect tests, suggesting that these two ways of using memory are quite different (see Richardson-Klavehn & Bjork, 1988; Roediger & McDer- mott, 1993, for reviews). Studies of amnesia have made especially important contributions. Despite their frequently catastrophic failure on direct tests of memory, amnesics can show normal performance on indirect tests of memory (Graf& Schacter, 1985; Graf, Shimamura, & Squire, 1985; Warrington & Weiskrantz, 1970). These unconscious effects in indirect tests--usually expressed as a benefit con- ferred on subsequent processing by previous processing-- This research was supported by Natural Sciences and Engineering Re- search Council of Canada Grant A7459, and formed
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.779 | 0.024 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".