MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7100454384

1860s- Present.

2014· article· en· W7100454384 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdditive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRecreationJurisdictionTourismResource (disambiguation)Nova scotiaRealmCultural heritageWorld heritage
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

history. Beginning in the mid-1800s, it enjoyed local and non-local fame, alike, as an immensely popular summer destination. However, in the mid-twentieth century, the famous recreation and leisure site succumbed to the adverse effects of commercial sand and gravel mining. The practice had been taking place there throughout the 1940s until the early 1970s- prior to the beach’s protection under the province’s first Beaches Preservation and Protection Act (1967), in 1971, and even by provincial permit up until 1972. The negative impacts of extraction were vast – and the beach is still recovering today, under its current jurisdiction as municipal parkland. Observing this particular landscape thus brings past tensions to the forefront – most significantly, the competition between nineteenth and twentieth century notions of recreation and leisure, versus the environmental pressures of the resource extraction industry in Nova Scotia during the mid-twentieth century. Along with analyzing these trends and events, this thesis also examines the present significance of Silver Sands, as both a coveted coastal access point and as a heritage landmark. It does so by making use of a wide range of materials, within the realm of social and environmental history, geography, beach morphology, cultural studies and landscape studies. It also makes use of oral history, and includes an appendix of photographs and figures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.726
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.175
Teacher spread0.170 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdditive Manufacturing Materials and ProcessesFrench-language works237,207