MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7100512596

Extraction of Active and Sterile Neutrino Mixing Parameters with the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory

2008· article· en· W7100512596 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNeutrino Physics Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNeutrinoSolar neutrinoNeutrino oscillationSolar neutrino problemSterile neutrinoMixing (physics)Measurements of neutrino speedFlux (metallurgy)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Sudbury Neutrino Observatory (SNO) is a 1 kilotonne heavy-water Čerenkov detector designed to study fundamental properties of neutrinos produced by thermonuclear fusion reactions in the core of the Sun. The uniqueness of SNO resides in its capability to distinctively measure the total flux of all active neutrino flavours as well as the flux of electron neutrinos, through the Neutral-Current (NC) and Charged-Current (CC) interactions of neutrinos on deuterium, respectively. The measurements of the NC and CC fluxes for neutrinos originated from 8B disintegration inside the Sun unambiguously proved that neutrinos change their flavour while traveling to the Earth. These results are consistent with predictions from a neutrino oscillation hypothesis on neutrino flavour transitions due to the mixing of massive neutrino states. The NC measurement from SNO also solved the long-standing Solar Neutrino Problem (SNP). In this dissertation, the measurements of the fundamental properties of neutrinos, in particular their mixing parameters, are presented. Data samples from SNO and other experiments are used to extract the mixing parameters of active

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicNeutrino Physics ResearchFrench-language works237,207