MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7100633824

M oooii-93 ~C- O 2./-J Abstract submitted to AGU Ocean Science Meeting San Diego, CA February 12-16,1996 Upper Ocean Observations Across an Arctic Transect

2016· article· en· W7100633824 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHaloclineTransectArcticSalinityTemperature salinity diagramsThe arcticWater mass
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The ability to identify and quantify seasonal and interannual temperature and salinity variations in the Arctic Ocean is critical to detecting warming trends, understanding circulation, and observing water mass movements. The SCICEX tests are currently addressing these issues. One phase of the SCICEX-95 test, conducted during April of 1995, allowed for a Transarctic snapshot of the upper water column. The transect lasted for eight days and extended approximately 1400 nm over the Arctic Ocean central basin, from near Pt. Barrow Alaska (72.05°N,-149.88°W) to Franz Josef Land (85.33°N, 51.3°E). Sixty-eight submarine launched, under ice, expendable conductivity, temperature, and depth (SSXCTD) probes were deployed at the rate of one probe approximately every 20 nm. The shallow (40 m) mixed layer at the westernmost end of the track, between the Canada Abyssal Plain and the Northwind Ridge, displayed the warmest, least saline surface water. Below this layer, the halocline layer exhibited a dramatic 3.0 psu salinity gradient over 35 m depth.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.391
Threshold uncertainty score0.869

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.3910.208

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamics→French-language works237,207→