MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7100660382

Understanding FAS: A Practical Approach to Prevention, Diagnosis and Management

2001· article· en· W7100660382 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPrenatal Substance Exposure Effects
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFetal alcohol syndromeFetal alcoholIncidence (geometry)Prenatal alcohol exposureTerm (time)Pregnancy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fetal alcohol syndrome (FAS) and FAS spectrumdeficits (FASD) are the most common and com-pletely preventable forms of developmental disabil-ities and birth defects in Canada. The term FAS was first used in 1973 by Jones and Smith to describe a group of children born to alcoholic mothers, and included the following abnormalities: • Growth retardation; • Characteristic facial features; and • Central nervous system involvement.1 The estimated incidence of FAS in Canada is between 0.5 and three per 1,000 live births.2 It is now recognized that prenatal alcohol exposure can cause a spectrum of deficits, with FAS being the most readily recognizable. Other conditions associ-

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.013
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.043

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.013
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0050.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.003
Scholarly communication0.0050.008
Open science0.0040.006
Research integrity0.0070.012
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.133
GPT teacher head0.338
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPrenatal Substance Exposure Effects→French-language works237,207→