Western University From the SelectedWorks of Richard B. Philp
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Director of the Undersea Hydrolab habitat; a facility that allowed divers to live for several days at a depth of about 15 meters (50 feet) and make unlimited dives around the facility with a technique called saturation diving. Bob has recently written a book, “Eyes in the Sea ” (1) that details his remarkable diving career. One expedition in 1974 involved a saturation dive in the Canadian Arctic beneath 7 feet (2 meters) of ice. This was organized by Canadian physician, diver and explorer Joe MacInnis. The objective was to live in the sea for 24 hours in an undersea habitat and carry out observations of sea life and conduct some experiments. The divers breathed oxygen before returning to the surface to avoid the bends. This precaution was sufficient due to the shallow nature of the dive. Traces of 2, 4-D, the herbicide, were found in shallow depressions gouged by the ice in the sea floor. This was one of the earliest observations of pesticides in the Arctic where they had never been used. Traces of oil were also found, believed to have come from the numerous ships that plied these waters. Another experiment involved releasing crude oil just beneath the ice cover and observing its behaviour. It took about seven days for the oil to migrate through the ice and reach the surface; a rate of about one foot per day. It was noted that the environmental
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.554 | 0.383 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".