Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The CROSSFLOW Ultrasonic Flow Measurement (UFM) System, developed by the Advance Measurement and Analysis Group (AMAG) of Mississauga, Ontario, is being marketed to nuclear power plants worldwide in conjunction with ABB Combustion Engineering Nuclear Power (ABB CENP) of Windsor, CT. The CROSSFLOW UFM System provides a means for plant operators to recover power, currently lost to electric output, by increasing feedwater flow measurement accuracy. CROSSFLOW consists of four (4) ultrasonic transducers mounted on a metal support frame that attaches, externally, to the feedwater piping (or any pipe in which the flow rate is to be measured). The ultrasonic transducers are connected to a Signal Conditioning Unit (SCU) and a Data Processing Computer (DPC). A Multiplexer (MUX) is also available for automatically sequencing measurements on multiple channels. There is one (1) upstream and one (1) downstream transducer station, each station consisting of one (1) transmitting and one (1) receiving transducer which send out the turbulence signatures to the DPC through the
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.056 | 0.009 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it