Arctic Ocean and Beaufort Sea into northwestern Canada.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
GULF OF ALASKA BLOCKING Ths great departure of this wind speed distribution from Blocking conditions in the Gulf of Alaska region pre- the January normal and from the pattern of December vailed throughout January 1957. The consequences of 1956 (see fig. 3A of [2]) was a direct consequence of the that aberration will be emphasized, but first. it will be persistent blocking in the Gulf of Alaska. shown how this tenacious feat'ure fitt'ed into the general The mean sea level chart for January and its anomalous circulation. pressure field (fig. 3) also reflects the blocking. On the Figure 1 is the 700-mb. 30-day mean chart for January January normal sea level map [13] high pressure in the 1957. The hemispheric circulation consisted of three eastern Pacific is confined to the area southward from 40' full-latitude troughs located along the east coasts of Asia K., while the region north of 40 ' N. is occupied by a lobe and North America and near the Ural Mountains. The of the Aleutian Low. This month, in contrast, the pattern would have been rather symmetrical had there eastern Pacific was covered by an extensive meridional been a fourth full-latitude trough in the eastern Pacific ant'icyclone, and sea level pressures in the Gulf of Alaska Ocean. Instead, the flow in that area was distorted by were as much as 21 mb. above normal.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.056 | 0.010 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".