Author manuscript, published in "NFSI 2011, Banff: Canada (2011)" MEG/EEG source reconstruction based on Gabor thresholding in the source space
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract—Thanks to their high temporal resolution, source reconstruction based on Magnetoencephalography (MEG) and/or Electroencephalography (EEG) is an important tool for noninvasive functional brain imaging. Since the MEG/EEG inverse problem is ill-posed, inverse solvers employ priors on the sources. While priors are generally applied in the time domain, the time-frequency (TF) characteristics of brain signals are rarely employed as a spatio-temporal prior. In this work, we present an inverse solver which employs a structured sparse prior formed by the sum of ℓ21 and ℓ1 norms on the coefficients of the Gabor TF decomposition of the source activations. The resulting convex optimization problem is solved using a first-order scheme based on proximal operators. We provide empirical evidence based on EEG simulations that the proposed method is able to recover neural activations that are spatially sparse, temporally smooth and non-stationary. We compare our approach to alternative solvers based also on convex sparse priors, and demonstrate the benefit of promoting sparse Gabor decompositions via a mathematically principled iterative thresholding procedure. I.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.514 | 0.190 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".