MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7100787734

©2014 Society of Economic Geologists, Inc. Economic Geology, v. 109, pp. 1643–1666 The Nature and Origin of the Rare Earth Element Mineralization in

2016· article· en· W7100787734 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFelsicMaficIlmeniteMineralization (soil science)DikeMagma chamberRare-earth elementMelt inclusionsZirconFractional crystallization (geology)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Misery syenitic intrusion in northern Quebec is host to a potentially important, recently discovered rare earth element (REE)-Zr-Nb prospect, containing significant concentrations of both light and heavy REEs, and is conspicuous on aeromagnetic maps as a well-defined, ring-shaped anomaly. Felsic syenite composed of idiomorphic perthite with interstitial mafic minerals, comprising fayalite, hedenbergite, ferropargasite and annite dominates the exposed outer part of the intrusion (the core is covered by Misery Lake). This unit is accompanied by ferrosyenite containing up to 50 vol % mafic minerals, including cumulate fayalite. The ferrosy-enite, which occurs as amoeboid-like inclusions in the felsic syenite, is interpreted to have formed by fractional crystallization of ferromagnesian minerals, leaving behind a residual magma which produced the felsic syenites. This latter magma was progressively enriched in alkalis and silica, and only became saturated in ferromagnesian minerals at a very late stage of crystallization. The bulk of the REE mineralization was initially concentrated in pods and layers of fluorapatite that accumulated as a result of gravitational settling. The fluorapatite crystals were partly or completely replaced by britholite-(Ce), which further enriched the rocks in LREEs. Locally, thin quartz-fayalite dikes cut the felsic syenite. These dikes contain up to 10 vol % fergusonite-(Y) and 8 vol % zir-con, and are interpreted to be products of an immiscible FeO-SiO2-rich magma into which Zr, Nb, and HREEs were preferentially fractionated from the conjugate felsic syenite magma.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.250
Threshold uncertainty score0.837

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.005
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2500.165

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.196
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeological and Geochemical Analysis→French-language works237,207→