Front Cover: The Stone Witch of Wookey Hole
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Would you be interested in a Ghost Club trip to the Pacific Northwest coast of the United States for a spooky Tour? Ghost Club friend Jeff Davis has offered to put together a Ghost Tour exclu-sively for Ghost Club members. He writes: “To Ghost Club members visiting the Pa-cific Northwest, I can offer a free ghost walk of Old-Towne Portland, Oregon. A haunted walk around Fort Vancouver and the Vancouver Barracks, what was the last bastion of the British Empire below the 54th Parallel. Depending on itineraries and the desires of my friends across the water, I can cer-tainly put them in touch with other para-normal groups here in the US. Together, I am sure we can plan many day trips to many locales, and arrange guest invita-tions at different properties, other ghost walks and aid in finding food and lodgings in haunted venues. I also worked for our National Forest sys-tem for several years. Depending on the time of year, I can also act as guide to some locales in the pacific Northwest. Possibly to Native American vision quest sites, certainly to some wild woodlands.” If anyone is interested and would like to know more, please e-mail events@ghostclub.org.uk or edi-tor@ghostclub.org.uk and we will put
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.720 | 0.381 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".