Locomotion Interface on a Virtual Plane
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper presents the design of a kind of locomotion interface. The design goal is to allow a user to walk on the device with limited size, and to give the user the sensation of walking on a infinite plane. It looks like the treadmill, but it can give the user the sensation of walking on a 2D plane. After the related works, the structure of the locomotion interface is presented first. Then the control principle of the device is given. Final, the system, the software and the conclusion of this interface are shown. __________________________________________________________________________________________ VIRTUAL REALITY AND PROTOTYPING June 1999, Laval (France) Locomotion Interface on a Virtual Plane WANG Jiaxin, ZHAO Yannan, JIA Peifa, TU Nan, and ZHU Dakai State Key Laboratory of Intelligent Technology and Systems Department of Computer Science and Technology Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, CHINA Tel: +86 10 62782266 Fax: +86 10 62771138 Email: wjx@s1000e.cs.t...
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".