Thirty-Seven CAIS- ACSI Conferences, 1973–2009
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Résumé: Cet article examine l’histoire des trente-sept premiers colloques de l’Association canadienne des sciences de l’information / Canadian Association for Information Science (CAIS-ACSI) et leur évolution entre 1973 et 2009. Les lieux de rencontre, le financement, l’assistance et les orateurs du colloque sont décrits. Le nombre de communications présentées à chaque colloque est noté, et le nombre présenté en anglais et en français est analysé. Dans l’appendice A, on trouvera une bibliographie annotée approfondie précisant les publications d’actes, ainsi que des notes sur chaque colloque indiquant les orateurs principaux, les événements spéciaux, les thèmes et les sujets des communications présentées. Les colloques de cette association offrent une riche histoire des sciences de l’information au Canada. Mots-clés: Association canadienne des sciences de l’information (ACSI), sciences de l’information, colloques historiques, colloques d’association Abstract: The history of the first 37 conferences of the Canadian Association for Information Science / Association canadienne des sciences de l’information
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it