Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Aging is universal, but the meaningfulness of growing old is variable, impacted by demographics, national economic resources, and society’s expectations, or lack thereof—for the elderly. (Julia Tavares Alvarez, Reflections on an Agequake, United Nations, 1999) The Active Living Coalition for Older Adults (ALCOA) envisions a society where all older adults are leading active lives and thus contributing to their health and overall well-being. ALCOA’s programs have always had components that have countered ageism. In 1999 ALCOA published a framework for developing policy and programs aimed at promoting active living for older adults called Moving Through the Years: A Blueprint for Action for Active Living for Older Adults. The Blueprint countered ageism by recognizing the need for: · Gaining a more accurate perspective of older adults ’ capabilities and developing more positive attitudes toward aging; · Involving seniors in planning and decision-making around active living programs; · Exploring the needs and interests of older adults with respect to physical activity and designing programs accordingly; and · Providing more inclusive active living opportunities that accommodate intergenerational
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it