Planetary science with adaptive optics: results from the UH AO systems
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In spite of observations made with space probes or the Hubble Space Telescope (HST), a wealth of new results have and can still be obtained from the ground using telescopes equipped with adaptive optics (AO). We present here results obtained with the University-of-Hawaii 13-actuator AO system and with the new 36-actuator "Hokupa'a" system. Both were utilized at the Canada-FranceHawaii Telescope (CFHT). Results include i) the observation of Saturn's rings as the Earth was crossing the ring plane in August 95, ii) the monitoring of Neptune's cloud activity, the detection and orbital determination of its faint satellites, iii) the observation of Io's volcanoes thermal emission, iv) the mapping of Titan's surface, v) the narrow-band photometry of the resolved PlutoCharon system, vi) the geological mapping of asteroids. 1. Introduction Given the wealth of information brought by space probes on the solar system, it may come as a surprise that adaptive optics images taken from the ground ar...
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".