MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7100941369

Implementing Best Practices within International Distance Education Initiatives: Lessons Learned from the Mexico-Canada Distance Education Project

2007· article· en· W7100941369 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicOnline and Blended Learning
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDistance educationAgency (philosophy)Best practiceOpen educationProfessional development
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

: The Open School, a division of the Open Learning Agency of British Columbia, was involved in a three-year project (1996-1998) in Mexico with the goal of providing wider access to basic education through the creation of technology-based instructional materials for basic education. This paper elaborates on the model and discusses some of the lessons learned in the design and management of collaborative, technology-based distance education and distributed learning projects. Instrumentalizando las mejores practicas en iniciativas internacionales de Educacion a Distancia En esta presentacion se tomaran en cuenta las lecciones aprendidas en el diseno y en la administracion colaborativa de proyectos a distancia, realizados entre la Open School de Canada y el Instituo Latinoamericano de la Comunicacion Educativa de Mexico. Durante esta colaboracion se empleo una version modificada del Enfoque Logico Integrado (LFA), que es un metodo integrado para la administracion y evaluacion de programa...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.017
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.017
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.207
Threshold uncertainty score0.484

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0170.017
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0130.007
Scholarly communication0.0100.003
Open science0.0030.007
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.086
GPT teacher head0.448
Teacher spread0.362 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicOnline and Blended Learning→French-language works237,207→