Bibliographic record
Abstract
lates in Canada are described to better understand the significance for wildlife and public health. We types (G1–G3), which have a global distribution, are responsible coccus canadensis) (Sweatman and Williams, 1963; Nakao et al., 2006; Thompson et al., 2006; Moks et al., 2008). Echinococcus tive canid hosts (such as wolves and coyotes [Canis latrans]) and angifer tarandus], rvus canad raw viscer Himsworth 2010), and because of their close proximity to people, sho regularly de-wormed or denied viscera to avoid zoonotic tra sion. Infected canids harbor adult tapeworms in their small intes-tine, shedding gravid proglottids and infective eggs into the environment in feces. These eggs, once ingested by a suitable ungulate intermediate host, penetrate the walls of the small intes-tine as oncospheres, and eventually develop into unilocular larval cysts in various organs (most often lungs (Sweatman, 1952; Ritcey and Edwards, 1958; Addison et al., 1979)). Neither the definitive nor intermediate wildlife hosts appear to suffer serious adverse q Note: Nucleotide sequence data reported in this paper are available in the
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.241 | 0.066 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".