1 SUBMISSION TO THE ANGLICAN CHURCH OF CANADA MARRIAGE COMMISSION
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Question 1: How do you interpret what Scripture says about marriage? I understand the scriptures to describe that marriage is between man and woman, and man and woman only. I believe that the unlawful sexual relations forbidden by God in Leviticus 18 are explicit and literal commandments which are still in effect for those who worship Christ today. Furthermore it is my opinion that Romans 1:18-32 offers an explanation as to why such sexual relations are displeasing to God, further strengthening the relationship between the Old and New Testaments. Question 2: How do you understand the theological significance of gender difference in marriage? Mankind is male and female, and male and female are complimentary to one another. I understand the gender difference in marriage to be an image of the fullness of humanity; the unity of the duality of the two human sexes. I believe that in the complimentary nature of maleness to femaleness and vice versa, the two were made by God to work together.1 Karl Barth says, “to live humanly means never to escape the astonishment of one’s own sex at the other, and the desire of one’s sex to know the other.”2 I believe then that gender
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".