Sports dermatology part 2: swimming and other aquatic sports DERMATOLOGY
Bibliographic record
Abstract
© 2004 Canadian Medical Association or its licensors Swimmer’s xerosis: Swimmer’s xerosis, or dry skin, is common among swimmers. Dilution and melting of the natural protective skin sebum leads to moisture loss from the stratum corneum, which results in a dry, scaly, itchy skin.1 Xerosis is exacerbated by the long hot showers that swimmers are notorious for taking, as well as by long soaks in Jacuzzis and hot tubs. Management: Xerosis can be prevented by limiting immediate post-swim showers to quick rinse-offs, preferably in lukewarm or cool water. Small quantities of a mild oil-based soap or soap substitute (e.g., Spectro Jel 609) are preferable to irritating shower-room soap solutions. An oil-based protective emollient should be applied immediately after thoroughly pat-drying oneself with a towel. Plain petroleum jelly or mineral oil can be used as an inexpensive and effective moisturizer, although less greasy creams are more appealing to most people. Topical steroid preparations are occasionally needed to treat ar-eas that develop eczema, with the strength of preparation varying depending on the affected body part and on the severity of the eczema. D
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.236 | 0.072 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".