MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7101069052

Provenance of the Proterozoic Thelon Basin, Nunavut, Canada, from detrital zircon geochronology and detrital quartz oxygen isotopes

2003· article· en· W7101069052 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsZirconProvenanceGeochronologyArcheanProterozoicQuartzSedimentary rockMetamorphic rockBasement
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Paleoproterozoic Thelon Basin in Nunavat, Canada, is one of several large quartz-dominated sedimentary basins devel-oped on Paleoproterozoic and Archean rocks of the Canadian Shield. Coarse-grained quartz to sub-feldspathic sandstones and conglomerates of the Thelon Formation comprise the basin fill. Detrital zircons from the Thelon Formation have LAM-ICP-MS 207Pb–206Pb ages ranging from 3.94 to 1.78 Ga, but most are Neoarchean (2.70–2.50 Ga). The δ18O values of quartz range from 7.7 to 13.9‰, and are typically 10–12‰. Ages, U/Zr ratios, and oxygen isotopic compositions of detrital quartz are consistent with a predominantly Neoarchean metasedimentary source, such as surrounds the eastern Thelon Basin and comprises the bulk of basement rocks within the Rae domain. The three stratigraphic sequences of the Thelon Formation have δ18O ranges for detrital quartz and zircon ages that further constrain the source areas and support previous sequence-stratigraphic interpretations. The lower sequence contains reworked siltstone and sandstone clasts and 2.50–1.85 Ga zircons indicating a contribution from Paleoproterozoic terranes. Detrital quartz δ18O values range from 9.8 to 13.9‰, indicating a metamorphic source also, which is consistent with a proximal source for the lower sequence. The middle sequence contains zircons exhibiting the widest range of ages (3.94–1.78 Ga). A>3.4 Ga Paleoarchean zircon population, cannot be correlated to the immediately surrounding basement and therefore indicates a distal source, possibly in the order of 1000–2000 km away. The upper sequence contains relatively few zircons due to extensive

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.167

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.153
Teacher spread0.148 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeological and Geochemical Analysis→French-language works237,207→