Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Board’s approval of the IESO’s proposed 2005 capital expenditures on RAM in the amount of $200,000 and the proposed operating expenditures of $200,000 was approved on the condition that the IESO should not proceed with these expenditures without the agreement of the Ontario Power Authority (OPA), and that the IESO must submit to the Board copies of any agreement with OPA for review and approval of the activities that are proposed to be carried out by the IESO. Status: As noted in the 2006 – 2008 Business Plan, in response to the events of 2005 the IESO has focused its efforts on addressing current market issues prior to proceeding with significant market evolution. As such, and consistent with the IESO’s stated objective of closely co-ordinating with OPA, the IESO has not proceeded with implementation of RAM in 2005, nor is it proposing any capital and operating expenditures on RAM for the fiscal year 2006. 2. IESO STAKEHOLDERING Obligation: The Board directed the IESO to file its proposed stakeholdering process and proposed funding of
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.516 | 0.394 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".