MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7101158722

Abstract Visual Odometry Aided by a Sun Sensor and an Inclinometer

2016· article· en· W7101158722 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCannabis and Cannabinoid Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInclinometerOdometryVisual odometryMars Exploration ProgramOdometerOrientation (vector space)Position (finance)Tree traversalPosition error
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Due to the absence of any satellite-based global positioning system on Mars, the Mars Exploration Rovers commonly track position changes of the vehicle using a technique called visual odometry (VO), where updated rover poses are determined by tracking keypoints between stereo image pairs. Unfortunately, the error of VO grows super-linearly with the distance traveled, primarily due to the contribution of orientation error. This thesis outlines a novel approach incorporating sun sensor and inclinometer measurements directly into the VO pipeline, utilizing absolute orientation information to reduce the error growth of the motion estimate. These additional measurements have very low computation, power, and mass requirements, providing a localization improvement at nearly negligible cost. The mathematical formulation of this approach is described in detail, and extensive results are presented from experimental trials utilizing data collected during a 10 kilometre traversal of a Mars analogue site on Devon Island in the Canadian High Arctic. ii

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.031
Threshold uncertainty score0.061

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.348
Teacher spread0.328 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCannabis and Cannabinoid Research→French-language works237,207→