Kindergarten to Grade 12 Western Canadian Protocol for Collaboration in Basic Education
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Every reasonable effort has been made to trace the owners of copyrighted material and to make due acknowledgement. Any errors or omissions drawn to our attention will be rectified in any future editions. Permission is given by the copyright owners for any person to reproduce this document, or any part thereof, for educational purposes and on a nonprofit basis, with the exception of materials for which the Western Canadian Protocol does not hold copyright. Dear Associate and Assistant Deputy Ministers: ELDERS LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL Together we have reached an important milestone in history. We have developed a document that affirms the healing power of language for Aboriginal people and for the people in Canada. We have accomplished this together. This important framework sets us on a path of hope where the Aboriginal languages, once stilled, can now flourish. This document marks a turning point in the life and identity of Aboriginal peoples: it affirms that revitalizing our languages will brighten the hearts of our Elders, ignite the imaginations of our children, and help a new generation find its way to a full, responsible and healthful life once more.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.030 | 0.039 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.011 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.193 | 0.041 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".