The very rare Bog Elfin is found in
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Apr 1986 The Alfred Bog Committee authorizes a local real estate agent to acquire property. Nov 1986 Two hundred acres are acquired. Acquisition, funding / communication and management plans are completed and approved. Dec 1987 The Nature Conservancy of Canada is authorized to acquire the Cobi Foods property. Apr 1988 The acquisition of the Cobi Foods property and a financing strategy is approved (3800 acres for $725,000). Sept 1988 The Minister of the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources attends the official announcement at Alfred College of the purchase of the Cobi Foods property. Nov 1988 The Alfred Bog Committee authorizes the preparation of a life science inventory and a land owner contact program. Jan 1991 A report on the land owner contact is received. Certificates are awarded to land owners pledging to preserve land they own in the bog. Jan 1992 The Life Science Inventory by Ted Mosquin is received. The construction of a boardwalk is approved. Mar 1993 The Committee approves a statement of management principles. Two hundred acres are added to the protected land. Jul 1994 The boardwalk is put in place. Nov 1996 The finished Alfred Bog Management Plan is accepted. Nov 1997 The Alfred Bog Committee approves in principle and depending on the detail, that the land acquired to date be used to create an Ontario Parks Nature Reserve under the Legacy 2000 program. It also approves a list of jobs to be done when resources become available. Dec 1999 The first Official Plan for the United Counties of Prescott and Russell becomes law but local peat extractors appeal those provisions of the Plan that protect the Bog. The Ontario Municipal Board will hear the appeal this year. Oct 2001 Another large property (3200 acres) in the bog is acquired by The Nature Conservancy for $2,500,000. The governments of Canada and Ontario each paid 1/3 and the remaining $820,000 was raised privately in the next few years.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.609 | 0.383 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".