MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7101232195

CHAPTER ELEVEN: MARKETING STRATEGY AND PLANNING StoraEnso: A Global Forestry Company

2015· article· en· W7101232195 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicBusiness Strategies and Management Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCorporationShareholderPosition (finance)Stock (firearms)Limited companyProfit (economics)Global marketingQuarter (Canadian coin)Asset (computer security)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

StoraEnso is one of the leading integrated forestry companies – one that has a worldwide approach to its business. It is the world’s second largest producer of paper and board as of the first quarter of 2002, being only narrowly superseded by International Paper. The total paper and board capacity is 15 million tonnes/year. UPM-Kymmene is the closest competitor below them with roughly 12 million tonnes/year. The five core areas of production at StoraEnso are magazine paper, newsprint, fine paper, packaging boards and timber products. The company is listed on the Helsinki, Stockholm and New York stock exchanges. A key organizational asset of the firm is its global marketing network, which has enabled StoraEnso to reach annual sales of approximately EUR 13.5 billion. The year 2000 brought a big leap forward in sales and profit, and the figures have stabilized in 2001. Sales continue to grow in absolute terms, though the operating profit as percentage of sales has diminished from 18 % to 11%. The Leader of the Group of StoraEnso in January 2002 was CEO Jukka Härmälä, with the position of Deputy CEO being held by Björn Hägglund. The senior management team heads some 43 000 employees in over 40 countries, so the company is clearly a global corporation with worldwide 2 influence. However, the central regions for activity are Finland, Sweden, Germany and North America. The company is owned largely by Finnish and Swedish institutions, together with private shareholders from both of these countries. Other groups not defined here hold a 36 % minority of the shares. It is remarkable that these other shareholders only have voting power amounting to 13%.1 StoraEnso aims at profiling itself as a local company parallel with its image of a global firm. Its customers are primarily publishers, printing houses and merchants on the one hand and packaging, joinery and construction industries on the other. Thus, StoraEnso works mainly in the business-to-business environment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.078
Threshold uncertainty score0.260

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0130.004
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0780.036

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.309
GPT teacher head0.439
Teacher spread0.130 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicBusiness Strategies and Management ResearchFrench-language works237,207