MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7101233659

DISEASE OF THE MONTH Congenital Nephrogenic Diabetes Insipidus

2016· article· en· W7101233659 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicIon Transport and Channel Regulation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNephrogenic diabetes insipidusArginine vasopressin receptor 2Aquaporin 2AntidiureticVasopressinDiabetes insipidusVasopressin receptorKidney
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Congenital nephrogenic diabetes insipidus (NDI) is a rare disorder of the kidney characterized by the failure to concen-trate urine despite normal or elevated plasma concentrations of the antidiuretic hormone arginine vasopressin (AVP). The identifica-tion, characterization, and mutational analysis of two different genes, i.e., the AVP receptor 2 gene (AVPR2) and the vasopressin-sensitive water channel gene (aquaporin-2 [AQP2]), provide the basis for our understanding of two different hereditary forms of ND!: X-linked ND! and autosomal recessive NDI. A majority (>90%) of congenital ND! patients have AVPR2 mutations: Of 1 15 families with congenital ND! that were referred to our labo-ratories in Montreal and Berlin, 105 families had A VPR2 muta-tions and 10 had AQP2 mutations. When studied in vitro, most AVPR2 mutations lead to receptors that are trapped intracellularly and are unable to reach the plasma membrane. A minority of the

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.182
Teacher spread0.177 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicIon Transport and Channel RegulationFrench-language works237,207