MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7101403148 · doi:10.1093/eurpub/ckaf161.1235

Income inequality trends in cardiovascular health among Canadian children and youth from 2007-2019

2025· article· en· W7101403148 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Public Health · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicFungal Plant Pathogen Control
Canadian institutionsToronto Public HealthPublic Health OntarioUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInequalityQuartileSocioeconomic statusCardiovascular healthHealth equityEconomic inequalityBody mass indexYoung adult

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Socioeconomic inequalities in cardiovascular health are well-documented among older adults, but evidence in children and youth is limited. This study assessed income inequalities in cardiovascular health among Canadian children and youth (6-17 years) from 2007-2019, compared to young (18-39 years) and middle-aged adults (40-64 years). Methods This serial cross-sectional study included 25,500 respondents from six biennial cycles of the nationally representative Canadian Health Measures Survey. Equivalized household income quartiles were used to assess socioeconomic position. Sub-optimal cardiovascular health was defined as the presence of obesity, hypertension, diabetes, or dyslipidemia, based on age-specific biomarker thresholds and medication use. Relative and absolute income inequalities in cardiovascular health were quantified using the relative index of inequality (RII) and slope index of inequality (SII), where RII values >1 and SII values >0 indicate pro-rich inequality. Sex-specific analyses and interaction terms were used to evaluate inequality trends. Results The prevalence of sub-optimal cardiovascular health decreased from 2007-2019 for children and youth (22.9%-17.1%, p < 0.01), but remained stable for young (28.4%-27.0%, p = 0.44) and middle-aged adults (55.4%-54.6%, p = 0.88). Income inequalities increased over time for children and youth (RIIs=1.39-3.59, p = 0.01; SIIs=0.07-0.22, p = 0.03). Inequalities were present in young and middle-aged adults, but no significant trends emerged. Among children and youth, inequalities increased over time for males (RIIs=1.09-4.63, p < 0.01; SIIs=0.02-0.29, p = 0.01), while no significant trends were observed for females (RIIs=1.85-2.47, p = 0.27; SIIs=0.13-0.13, p = 0.42). Conclusions Persistent and widening income inequalities in cardiovascular health are evident among children and youth in Canada from 2007-2019. Targeted prevention efforts and policies are needed to address rising cardiovascular health inequalities. Key messages • Persistent relative and absolute income inequalities in cardiovascular health are evident among children and youth, young adults, and middle-aged adults in Canada. • Although the prevalence of sub-optimal cardiovascular health declined from 2007-2019 among children and youth, inequalities widened, with the largest increases observed among males.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.012
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.453
Threshold uncertainty score0.821

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0120.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it