Building adaptive capacity and climate change resiliency in rural communities
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Resilient rural communities are not only those that can adapt to changing socio-economic conditions, but are also plan for and adapt to a changing climate. Using a guidebook developed by the Canadian Model Forest Network, Black River First Nation (Manitoba) undertook a 3-year project to address risks to the community and their traditional area posed by climate change. The project involved a community core team which documented their observations of changes in climate and its impact on the community and traditional area over the last 50 years, developed historic and current climate profiles from meteorological data in the region, used climatic global circulation models to predict changes in climate in their traditional area to the year 2080 and assessed current and future risks. Based on the vulnerability assessment, the community developed an action plan to adapt to current and future changes in climate. Actions included updating their emergency preparedness and response plan, developing wildfire protection plans for the community and a nearby cottage subdivision they are planning, and upgrades to community infrastructure (drinking water and sewage treatment), among others. As a result of the project, more than $15 million has been invested in making the community more climate-resilient.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".