Beyond Seasonal Economies: A supernatural offering
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Are the stories told on Charlottetown’s Ghostly Realm walking tours true? Does it matter? Is the folklore of Prince Edward Island a window into a distorted past or a resource that promises to deliver economic benefits to local communities? A map of local legends pertaining to the Island’s supernatural heritage is presented. Stemming in graduate research, it offers to augment existing visual aids made available to visitors: such as the routing of the Confederation trail; the well-marketed image that divides ‘The Gentle Island’ into four touring regions (i.e., the Green Gables Shore, Red Sands Shore, Points East Coastal Drive and North Cape Coastal Drive); or the map that marks the locations of island shipwrecks and lighthouses. The graphic representation of local legends not only puts smaller island settlements ‘on the map’ in a climate of shifting demographics and tourism trends, but inspires one to ask whether the cultural heritage of Islanders can help offset the strain that seasonality imposes on local businesses. The underlying hypothesis is that the folkloric knowledge reflected in supernatural stories about the island can create a strong backbone for place-based economic diversification by extending the range of year-round cultural activities.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".