MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7101616945 · doi:10.1109/tetci.2025.3605627

Benchmarking Deep Legendre-SNN for Time Series Classification – Analysis and Enhancements

2025· article· en· W7101616945 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computational Intelligence · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNeural Networks and Reservoir Computing
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNational Science Foundation
KeywordsBenchmark (surveying)BenchmarkingUnivariateTime seriesMultivariate statisticsNeuromorphic engineeringArtificial neural networkSeries (stratigraphy)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Compute- and energy-efficient Time Series Classification (TSC) is the need of the hour – to cater the continually growing sources and applications of temporal data. State-of-the-Art (SoTA) temporal computational models, e.g., LSTMs/RNNs, HIVE-COTE, Transformers, etc., are high performing, but are also resource intensive, resulting in high energy consumption on CPUs/GPUs. On the contrary, Reservoir Computing (RC) based models are resource-efficient and perform well for simple TSC datasets; and when implemented with <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">spiking</i> neurons, spiking RC-based models offer the promise of <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">high energy-efficiency</i> on neuromorphic hardware. In this work, we analyse, enhance, and benchmark the newly introduced – spiking RC-based, “Legendre Spiking Neural Network” (Legendre-SNN or LSNN) model for TSC. We theoretically investigate the Legendre Delay Network (LDN) that acts as a reservoir in the LSNN model, and bring some useful insights into the design of the LDN-based models. In our analysis, we find that a <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">higher order</i> LDN is necessary for optimal performance with input signals composed of <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">higher</i> frequencies. We also extend the existing LSNN model to multivariate time-series signals and propose the “DeepLSNN” model. We conduct experiments with DeepLSNN on 102 benchmark TSC-datasets (comprising both univariate and multivariate signals). Via such large scale experiments, we present the <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">first benchmark-results</i> for <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">spiking</i>-TSC. Considering DeepLSNN's best results, we find that it outperforms the <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">non-spiking</i> LSTM-FCN on more than 31% of the 102 datasets. We note that our benchmark-results can serve as a comparison criterion for other <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">spiking</i>-TSC experiments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.851
Threshold uncertainty score0.609

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it