MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7101725183 · doi:10.1109/mc.2025.3596552

IEEE 3152: A Standard for Human and Machine Agency Identification

2025· article· W7101725183 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueComputer · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldChemistry
TopicChemical synthesis and alkaloids
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIdentification (biology)Agency (philosophy)Key (lock)Expert system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article introduces IEEE Standard 3152, a new standard for systematic disclosure of human, artificial intelligence (AI), and hybrid agency in digital interactions and media. The standard defines visual-, audio-, and metadata-based markers to differentiate between human and machine-generated content, addressing concerns about deception, misattribution, and AI-driven manipulation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.014
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.033
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.073

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0140.033
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0060.004
Science and technology studies0.0040.003
Scholarly communication0.0090.008
Open science0.0040.005
Research integrity0.0080.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0180.022

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueComputerSame topicChemical synthesis and alkaloidsFrench-language works237,207