MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7102390667 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.17470546

Antibiotic Resistance in Salmonella Typhi

2025· article· W7102390667 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicSalmonella and Campylobacter epidemiology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTyphoid feverAntibiotic resistanceSalmonella typhiAntibioticsPublic healthSerotypeSanitationDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Antibiotic Resistance in Salmonella Typhi **Abstract** Typhoid fever caused by *Salmonella enterica* serovar *Typhi* (*S. Typhi*) remains a severe public health problem globally, particularly in low- and middle-income nations. The emergence and global spread of antibiotic-resistant strains have significantly increased the difficulty of treatment, morbidity, and the risk of outbreaks. Previously, first-line agents such as chloramphenicol, ampicillin, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole succeeded with treatment. Multidrug-resistant (MDR) strains resistant to all three agents emerged in the 1980s, followed by the emergence of fluoroquinolone-resistant strains in the 1990s and increasingly over the past few years, extensively drug-resistant (XDR) isolates resistant to nearly all oral agents. This article presents a comprehensive review of the molecular dynamics, epidemiology, clinical relevance, diagnostic problems, and methods of control and prevention of antibiotic resistance in *S. Typhi*. It is crucial to understand these dynamics in order to develop novel therapeutic and preventive strategies, improve surveillance, and promote global typhoid fever control. **Keywords:** *Salmonella Typhi*, typhoid fever, antibiotic resistance, MDR, XDR, fluoroquinolones, azithromycin, ceftriaxone, antimicrobial stewardship. --- ## **1. Introduction** *Salmonella enterica* serovar *Typhi* is a human-limited bacterium that causes typhoid fever—a systemic infection with sustained fever, abdominal cramps, and potentially life-threatening complications like intestinal perforation or encephalopathy. The World Health Organization (WHO, 2023) estimates 11–20 million cases and 120,000–160,000 deaths annually worldwide. South Asia, sub-Saharan Africa, and parts of Southeast Asia bear the disease burden disproportionately heavy because of inadequate sanitation and restricted access to clean water, permitting spread of the disease. Antibiotics have been the cornerstone of typhoid therapy for decades. However, *S. Typhi* has been extremely plastic, acquiring and transferring resistance genes that have rendered most conventional therapies ineffective. This emerging antibiotic resistance not only complicates therapy but also poses a serious threat to public health via enhanced transmission, prolonged illness duration, and increased healthcare costs (Andrews et al., 2021). --- ## **2. Historical Background of Antibiotic Treatment and Resistance in *S. Typhi*** ### **2.1 Pre-antibiotic Era** Before the antibiotic period, typhoid fever was managed primarily by means of supportive treatment. The discovery of chloramphenicol in 1948 revolutionized treatment, reducing mortality from approximately 20% to below 1% (Woodward et al., 1950). Chloramphenicol remained the drug of first choice until the late 1970s. ### **2.2 Emergence of Multidrug Resistance (MDR)** In the 1980s, chloramphenicol-resistant, ampicillin-resistant, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole-resistant *S. Typhi* strains collectively known as multidrug-resistant (MDR) *S. Typhi* began to appear in India, Pakistan, Vietnam, and Africa. The resistance was plasmid-mediated with *cat*, *blaTEM-1*, and *dhfrA* genes (Crump & Mintz, 2010). As a result of the appearance of MDR strains, traditional first-line medications yielded to fluoroquinolones. ### **2.3 The Fluoroquinolone Era** Ciprofloxacin and ofloxacin subsequently became the drug of choice during the 1990s. They were highly effective initially, but these drugs quickly lost their effectiveness with chromosomal mutations in the *gyrA* and *parC* genes that encode DNA gyrase and topoisomerase IV (Parry et al., 2002). This rendered them resistant and led to clinical treatment failures, prompting third-generation cephalosporins such as ceftriaxone and cefixime. ### **2.4 The Emergence of Extensively Drug-Resistant (XDR) *S. Typhi*** In 2016, Pakistan experienced the first chloramphenicol-resistant, ampicillin-resistant, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole-resistant, fluoroquinolone-resistant, and third-generation cephalosporin-resistant XDR *S. Typhi* outbreak, with only azithromycin and carbapenems being the remaining options (Klemm et al., 2018). This was a landmark point in typhoid control globally, highlighting the importance of new antibiotics and vaccines. --- ## **3. Mechanisms of Antibiotic Resistance** ### **3.1 Resistance to First-Line Agents * **Chloramphenicol Resistance:** Mediated by *cat* genes encoding chloramphenicol acetyltransferase, which inactivates the antibiotic through acetylation. * **Ampicillin Resistance:** Due to *blaTEM-1* and *blaSHV* β-lactamase genes that hydrolyze the β-lactam ring. * **Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole Resistance:** Involves *dfrA* and *sul* genes, which lead to altered dihydrofolate reductase and dihydropteroate synthase enzymes. ### **3.2 Fluoroquinolone Resistance** Fluoroquinolone resistance is mediated by: * Point mutations in *gyrA* (Ser83→Phe/Tyr) and *parC* (Ser80→Ile) genes. * Plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance (PMQR) genes such as *qnr*, *aac(6')-Ib-cr*, and *qepA*. They decrease fluoroquinolone binding to target enzymes, lessening the effectiveness of the drugs (Das et al., 2019). ### **3.3 Cephalosporin Resistance** Resistance to ceftriaxone and cefixime is mediated by extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs), particularly *blaCTX-M-15* and *blaTEM-1* genes that hydrolyze third-generation cephalosporins (Wong et al., 2019). ### **3.4 Azithromycin Resistance** Azithromycin resistance, through mutation in the *acrB* efflux pump gene and gaining the *mphA* macrolide phosphotransferase gene, has led to decreased intracellular concentration of the antibiotic (Hooda et al., 2019). ### **3.5 Carbapenem Resistance** Although rare, carbapenem-resistant *S. Typhi* isolates have been reported. Resistance is through gain of carbapenemase genes such as *blaNDM-1* on transmissible plasmids, creating a serious therapeutic issue (Kumar et al., 2021). --- ## **4.4 Epidemiology of Resistant *S. Typhi*** ### **4.1 Global Distribution** MDR and XDR *S. Typhi* strains are spread worldwide through travel, migration, and poor sanitation. The epicenter is South Asia, particularly Pakistan and India. Imported UK, USA, and Canadian infections frequently have a history of travel to endemic regions (Wong et al., 2019). ### **4.2 The XDR Outbreak in Pakistan** The 2016 Sindh outbreak of XDR, due to the H58 haplotype, was a turning point. Genomic studies identified the resistance determinants carried on an IncY plasmid harboring *blaCTX-M-15* and *qnrS* genes (Klemm et al., 2018). Over 10,000 cases had been reported by 2020, with worldwide distribution to the UK, USA, and Canada. ### **4.3 Regional Trends** * **Africa:** MDR strains are common, but ceftriaxone resistance is low. * **South Asia:** XDR and azithromycin-resistant isolates are prevalent. * **Southeast Asia:** Resistance to fluoroquinolones has emerged in Vietnam and Indonesia. * **Middle East and Europe:** Sporadic imported cases of XDR typhoid have been reported. --- ## **5. Clinical Implications** Resistance to antibiotics leads to: * Prolonged clearance of fever. * Increased relapse rates. * Increased complications like intestinal perforation. * Decreased treatment options and increased hospitalization duration. Fluoroquinolone resistance, on the other hand, raises median fever clearance time from 3 to 6 days (Parry et al., 2002). XDR cases, in turn, tend to need intravenous carbapenems or high-dose azithromycin, putting more healthcare burden. --- ## **6. Diagnosis and Detection of Resistance** ### **6.1 Conventional Culture and Sensitivity Blood culture remains the gold standard for diagnosis, but sensitivity is only 40–60%. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) on disk diffusion or automated systems like VITEK-2 identifies resistant phenotypes. ### **6.2 Molecular Methods** PCR and whole-genome sequencing (WGS) facilitate the quick identification of resistance genes (*bla*, *qnr*, *cat*, *mphA*) and track transmission. WGS has played a crucial role in identifying global spread of the H58 lineage (Wong et al., 2019). ### **6.3 Emerging Diagnostic Tools** Loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) and CRISPR-based assays are being developed for field-friendly resistance testing, with cost-effective and quick alternatives. --- ## **7. Treatment Strategies** ### **7.1 Current Recommendations** WHO (2022) recommends: * **Uncomplicated typhoid:** Azithromycin (10 mg/kg/day for 7 days) for oral therapy. * **Severe or XDR typhoid:** Carbapenems (meropenem/imipenem) or intravenous azithromycin. ### **7.2 Role of Combination Therapy Combination therapy, for example, azithromycin plus ceftriaxone, may avoid the development of further resistance but current evidence is sparse (Andrews et al., 2021). ### **7.3 Future Antimicrobials** New molecules like tebipenem, cefiderocol, and aztreonam-avibactam are being considered against resistant *S. Typhi* strains. Their accessibility and cost in endemic nations remain barriers, however. --- ## **8. Prevention and Control** ### **8.1 Vaccination** Typhoid conjugate vaccines such as Typbar-TCV provide long-term immunity and are WHO-preferred in children above 6 months in endemic regions (WHO, 2023). Mass vaccination is the backbone to relieve antibiotic pressure. ### **8.2 Sanitation and Hygiene** Improved sanitation, safe water, and food hygiene are the pillars of prevention even now. Community-based educational campaigns significantly decrease transmission. ### **8.3 Surveillance and Stewardship** Global initiatives like the Global Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance System (GLASS) track resistance patterns. Antimicrobial stewa

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Same topicSalmonella and Campylobacter epidemiology→French-language works237,207→