MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7102596925 · doi:10.1049/cds2/5591883

Bayesian‐Optimization‐Based Post‐Silicon Offset‐Cancelation Technique for Analog Multipliers

2025· article· en· W7102596925 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueIET Circuits Devices & Systems · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicLow-power high-performance VLSI design
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsOffset (computer science)MNIST databaseCMOSMultiplier (economics)Analog multiplierInput offset voltageIntegrated circuitDC bias

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a software‐controlled offset‐cancelation technique for analog multipliers that relies on the Bayesian‐optimization algorithm. The capability of the technique was investigated on a test multiplier, which was developed for future use in machine learning (ML) accelerators whose convergence is sensitive to process‐variation‐induced DC offsets. By adjusting the multiplier biasing voltages, the proposed Bayesian‐optimization‐based method was able to reduce the offset within ±1.8 mV from an uncorrected maximum offset of 10.6 mV. In addition to reducing offsets, the measurements of the 65‐nm CMOS multiplier also showed an average linearity‐error improvement of nearly 10%, from 12.2% prior to offset correction to 2.2% after correction. We demonstrate that the proposed offset correction improved the learning outcome accuracy for MNIST dataset digit classification from approximately 10% to 90%.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.993
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it