Review of <i>The Indian Association of Alberta: A History of\nPolitical Action</i> By Laurie Meijer Drees
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Native political organizations occupy a unique and important place in the Canadian political arena, whether on the national, provincial, or regional level. They offer a forum where both Native leaders and mainstream politicians can confer and, perhaps even more importantly, be seen to be conferring. This book is a study of one of the most influential of these organizations, the Indian Association of Alberta (IAA), from its beginning in 1939 as an organization devoted to regional and com~ unity issues to the 1960s, when it led the fight against the Trudeau government's "White Paper."\nOne of the volume's strengths is the special effort Meijer Drees has made to locate the development of the IAA in the political milieu of the 1930s and 1940s. She masterfully demonstrates how different provincial political parties, government acts, the development of farmers' unions, and other social political and economic factors contributed to the IAA's founding and growth. She also illustrates how current thought in the 1940s regarding social welfare programs was translated into Indian policy. Along the way she challenges many commonly-held preconceptions about early influences on the organization, such as the supposed impact of Native World War II veterans.\nPerhaps one of the most enlightening aspects of her study involves the role non-Natives played in the IAA's development. Drees pays particular attention to John Laurie, IAA secretary from 1944 to 1956. Through the IAA, Laurie was able to promote his personal view of what would benefit Indian peoples. His paternalistic and integrationist ideas played counterpoint to the ideas and interests of the organization's Native leaders. Along with discussing the effects of white liberal organizations such as the Friends of the Indian Society and the Indian Rights Association, Drees offers important and perceptive analyses of the motivations and political thought of Native leaders like John Calihoo, John T ootoosis, Harold Cardinal, and others.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".