MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7103417404

The Price of Patriotism\nAlberta Cattlemen and the Loss of the American\nMarket, 1942-48

2001· article· W7103417404 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueInsecta mundi · 2001
Typearticle
Language
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTariffGovernment (linguistics)Stock (firearms)Consumption (sociology)CommissionSpanish Civil WarStock market
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

One of the most controversial episodes in the history of the western Canadian cattle industry occurred during the years 1942-48 when the Canadian government imposed an embargo on Canadian cattle entering the United States. This unprecedented measure was a reaction to the extraordinary demands of the national war effort, and was accepted conditionally by the cattle industry as a necessary patriotic gesture. However, official wartime policies respecting this embargo, and its retention beyond the war until late 1948 were neither anticipated nor appreciated by western Canadian stockmen. Their efforts to restore a market deemed crucial to their industry's survival, and the government's seeming failure to appreciate the stockmen's position, clearly showed that the "price of patriotism" went beyond merely fighting a war.\nSince its inception in the early 1880s, the western Canadian cattle industry depended on export markets. Although home consumption accounted for about ninety percent of Canadian cattle marketings, it was the exportable ten percent that determined domestic prices and defined the quality standard for Canadian beef.! Over the years only two markets absorbed this annual surplus of between 15Q,000 and 200,000 head. The first was in Great Britain where demand for Canadian cattle helped nurture the western Canadian ranching industry up to 1907. This market was eclipsed after 1914 when relaxation of the American tariff encouraged the southward movement of Canadian cattle. This new American outlet for both fat stock and feeder cattle was so profitable that by 1920 it had become axiomatic among Canadian cattlemen that their industry's survival depended upon its availability.2 As such, much of the Canadian stockmen's economic travail between 1921 and 1935 was blamed on the renewed American tariffs of 1921-22 and 1930, that imposed daunting levies of between two and three cents per pound and which, especially during the years 1921-25 and 1930-34, made it virtually impossible to ship cattle profitably to United States points.3\nDespite its popularity among western Canadian cattlemen, the American market did not figure highly in the emerging Canadian agricultural policies of the period. It was perceived as unstable and subject to tariff volatility. More important, however, was the Canadian federal government's commitment to the British market as the most dependable and permanent outlet for its agricultural products. Especially after the Imperial Conference of 1932, when Britain formally abandoned her century-old commitment to free trade in favor of a system of imperial preference, Canadian policymakers became convinced that they had at last secured a market to absorb the nation's growing agricultural surpluses. That these agricultural policies were built around the British need for wheat and pork, and not cattle, mattered little in the new scheme of things. Cattle exports emerged as an add-on entity, one not really needed nor even wanted by Great Britain and certainly not a factor to the Canadian beef producer who realized that the British market was simply not viable in normal circumstances, and was but a pale replacement for the country's natural market in the United States.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.702
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.015
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInsecta mundiSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207