Listening walking, a sound walk, as an educational tool, and a gesture of sound creation
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Pedagogy of Listening through soundwalk offers an immersive approach to education, integrating attentive listening as a main tool. This method, anchored in the history of sound art and sound ecology, aims to raise participants' awareness of their sound environment and to develop their critical and creative listening skills. Through concrete examples such as sensitive audio tours and projects around water or the forest, this approach explores sound territories in a contextualized way. Tools such as the digital recorder and interactive maps enrich the experience, while action research promotes interdisciplinarity and social innovation. Despite the challenges related to the coordination of actors and resources, this approach promises to adapt to new territories explored thanks to technological advances and a return to authentic sensory connection. In conclusion, the pedagogy of listening offers stimulating perspectives for rethinking our relationship with soundscapes and promoting better living together in a constantly evolving world.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it