Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Shadows of Ethics: Criticism and the Just Society (Geoffrey Harpham) (Reviewed by James O’Rourke, Florida State University) The Romantic Performative: Language and Action in British and German Romanticism (Angela Esterhammer) (Reviewed by Thomas Pfau, Duke University) British Romanticism and the Science of Mind (Alan Richardson) (Reviewed by Irving Massey, State University of New York, Buffalo) Wordsworth’s Profession: Form, Class, and the Logic of Early Romantic Cultural Production (Thomas Pfau) (Reviewed by Karen A. Weisman, University of Toronto) The Challenge of Coleridge: Ethics and Interpretation in Romanticism and Modern Philosophy (David P. Haney) (Reviewed by Paul Youngquist, Penn State University) Lord Byron at Harrow School: Speaking Out, Talking Back, Acting Up, Bowing Out (Paul Elledge) (Reviewed by William D. Brewer, Appalachian State University) Nationalists and Nomads (Christopher L. Miller) (Reviewed by Louise M. Jefferson, Wayne State University) The National Uncanny: Indian Ghosts and American Subjects (Rene´e L. Bergland) (Reviewed by Richard Sax, Madonna University) Imagining the King’s Death: Figurative Treason, Fantasies of Regicide 1793–1796 (John Barrell) (Reviewed by Michael Scrivener, Wayne State University) The Crowd: British Literature and Public Politics (John Plotz) (Reviewed by Heidi Thomson, Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand) James Joyce’s Judaic Other (Marilyn Reizbaum) (Reviewed by Natania Rosenfeld, Knox College) Voices and Values in Joyce’s Ulysses (Weldon Thornton) (Reviewed by Marshall Needleman Armintor, Rice University)
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.006 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.009 | 0.008 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.061 | 0.248 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it