Review of <i>Reservation X: The Power of Place in Aboriginal\nContemporary Art</i> Edited by Gerald McMaster
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The reservation (or "reserve" in Canada) is a place with multi-layered meanings to contemporary Native People. As editor Gerald McMaster states, "the reserve has been both sanctuary and prison." While symbolizing community, home, family and tradition, by its very nature (government imposed confinement) it simultaneously represents repression, poverty, and the social ills that follow. For a reader interested in the Great Plains, or any other region, Reservation X: The Power of Place in Aboriginal Contemporary Art deftly illuminates these complex relationships through the work of seven artists and four authors.\nThe volume's first half is devoted to thought-provoking essays by McMaster, also curator of the exhibition, Paul Chaat Smith, Charlotte Townsend-Gault, and Nancy Marie Mithlo addressing the themes of art and place. These include a consideration of the cultural implications of Native space from the Indian Rights heyday of the 1970s to the ill-fated efforts to bring Native issues to public attention in 1992 (Smith), and the conflicted discourse found throughout multiple forms of contemporary Aboriginal art, such as performance and literature (Townsend-Gault).\nFollowing the essays, the authors provide brief background sketches of the artists with critical analyses, including detailed colored photographs, of each work contributed to Reservation X. The artists-Nora Naranjo-Morse (Santa Clara Pueblo), Marianne Nicolson (Kingcome Inlet), Shelley Niro (Six Nations Reserve), Jolene Rickard (Tuscarora Nation), Mateo Romero (Cochiti Pueblo), Mary Longman (Gordon Indian Reserve), and C. Maxx Stevens (Seminole Nation}-explore their relationships with their reservation communities and the influence of these relationships on their identities as Native People. The appraisals are capped with excerpts from interviews with the artists addressing the themes of family, community, and identity.\nSix of the seven works rest primarily on installations. The exception, a film by Niro, Honey Moccasin, was represented by an installation of fancy-dance dress composed of breakfast cereal and tire treads. In the film story these creative regalia were used to replace stolen traditional bead and featherwork in an unnamed "reservation x," proving that the community's Indian identity could continue to exist.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".