La réception nietzschéenne des sophistes grecs
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article s’inscrit dans la discussion visant à établir la relation que Nietzsche a entretenue avec les sophistes grecs. Une périodisation en trois temps permet de montrer qu’il a effectivement valorisé les sophistes grecs dès l’époque de ses cours de rhétorique de 1870 (section I), en particulier à travers des considérations sur le langage et l’agôn. Les sophistes, qui ont diffusé une éducation supérieure, sont associés à l’esprit libre. Entre 1876 et 1886, Nietzsche les qualifie à nouveau d’esprits libres et les unit sous la figure de Thucydide (section II). À la toute fin de sa vie, il présente un intérêt marqué envers leur réalisme et leur immoralisme (section III), qui préfigurent sa propre critique de la morale. La section IV analyse l’interprétation qu’a faite Nietzsche de la thèse protagoréenne de l’homme mesure.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".