MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7103755167 · doi:10.7202/1121044ar

La réception nietzschéenne des sophistes grecs

2025· article· fr· W7103755167 on OpenAlexaffvenue

Bibliographic record

VenueLaval théologique et philosophique · 2025
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicNietzsche, Schopenhauer, and Hegel
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRelation (database)Context (archaeology)Section (typography)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cet article s’inscrit dans la discussion visant à établir la relation que Nietzsche a entretenue avec les sophistes grecs. Une périodisation en trois temps permet de montrer qu’il a effectivement valorisé les sophistes grecs dès l’époque de ses cours de rhétorique de 1870 (section I), en particulier à travers des considérations sur le langage et l’agôn. Les sophistes, qui ont diffusé une éducation supérieure, sont associés à l’esprit libre. Entre 1876 et 1886, Nietzsche les qualifie à nouveau d’esprits libres et les unit sous la figure de Thucydide (section II). À la toute fin de sa vie, il présente un intérêt marqué envers leur réalisme et leur immoralisme (section III), qui préfigurent sa propre critique de la morale. La section IV analyse l’interprétation qu’a faite Nietzsche de la thèse protagoréenne de l’homme mesure.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.538
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLaval théologique et philosophiqueSame topicNietzsche, Schopenhauer, and HegelFrench-language works237,207