MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7103877762 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.17511225

Andrena (Micrandrena) lindbergella Pittioni 1950

2025· article· W7103877762 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant and animal studies
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDorsumCuticle (hair)PenisSexual dimorphismScape

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

3.1.2.14.Andrena(Micrandrena)lindbergellaPittioni, 1950 Figures 11, 15 L, 20 B, N Andrena lindbergella Pittioni, 1950: 42, ♀ [Cyprus: MZHF] Diagnosis of male. Within the Andrena minutula species group, A. lindbergella belongs to the species around A. rugulosa Stöckhert, characterized by a smooth clypeus and punctate terga, which include also A. alshaykh Pisanty sp. nov. and A. libanica Wood sp. nov. The male is easily differentiated from A. alshaykh by the genital capsule, in which the gonostyli are uniformly curving (suddenly converging medially, producing distinct kinks in the inner and outer margins in A. alshaykh), and the penis valves are narrower (Fig. 20 L, N). In addition, the scutum is more densely punctured, and the body size is larger. Both A. alshaykh and A. lindbergella are closely related to A. rugulosa Stöckhert (absent from the Levant) and A. libanica Wood sp. nov., but differ in the smoother scutum and more weakly punctured terga (Fig. 15 J – L). In addition, the male of A. rugulosa does not have dorsal gonocoxite lobes. Description of male. Body length: 6.5 mm. — Integumental colour: Body and legs black. Flagellum fully black, overlayed with minute grey setae. Wings weakly infuscate, veins and stigma dark brown (Fig. 11 A). Tergal marginal zones black, occasionally brownish apically (Fig. 11 D). — Pubescence: Clypeus with dense and long semi-erect white hairs, underlying cuticle partly obscured. Paraocular area ventrally with dense and long, semi-erect to erect whitish hairs, dorsally with short to medium, mostly black hairs. Supraclypeal area with medium-lengthed erect hairs, mostly whitish, a few black. Scape with dense medium to long hairs, mostly white, a few black. Frons with sparse, semi-erect medium-lengthed black hairs (Fig. 11 A, B). Preoccipital ridge with short to long erect whitish hairs. Upper margin of compound eye with sparse short black hair. Genal area with dense whitish hair, medium-lengthed dorsally, long ventrally (Fig. 11 A – C). Scutum, scutellum and metanotum with long erect hair, mostly yellowish-whitish, sparse centrally, denser peripherally, scutellum with few short erect black hairs. Mesepisternum and propodeum with very long white hairs (Fig. 11 A, C). Leg hair mostly whitish, partly brownish on tarsi (Fig. 11 A). Base of tergal disc 1 and lateral parts of all tergal discs with sparse, short to medium white hair, rest of tergal discs with minute inconspicuous whitish hair. Tergal marginal zones 2–4 with distinct, lateral white hair bands, 5 with very weak and sparse, continuous whitish hair band. Terminal fringe brownish, flanked by whitish hairs (Fig. 11 A, D). — Head: 1.2 times broader than long (Fig. 11 B). Mandibles bidentate, moderately crossed. Galea very finely shagreened. Labral process trapezoidal, apical part slightly elevated, apical margin concave. Clypeus domed, very shiny, basally very superficially shagreened, apically smooth, punctation strong and dense, density decreasing medioapically, distance between punctures <0.5–1 puncture diameter, without impunctate midline. Flagellomere 1 1.3 times longer than 3, 1.8 times longer than 2 (Fig. 11 B). Frons rugose-areolate, with clearly discernible embedded fine punctures. Ocelloccipital distance 1 ocellus diameter. Preoccipital ridge weakly carinate (Fig. 11 C). — Mesosoma: Dorsolateral angle of pronotum not elevated. Scutum and scutellum fully shagreened, slightly shiny, punctation fine, strong and dense, distance between punctures 0.5–1 puncture diameters on scutum, slightly sparser on scutellum (Fig. 11 C). Mesepisternum finely alveolate, overlayed by shallow oblique punctures. Anteroventral corner of propodeum reticulated, rest of propodeum rugose-areolate, propodeal triangle basally slightly more coarsely sculptured compared to flanking areas, apically very finely areolated (Fig. 11 C). Recurrent vein 1 meets submarginal cell 2 near its middle. Nervulus slightly antefurcal (Fig. 11 A). — Metasoma: Tergal discs 1–3 shagreened, distinctly finely punctured, distance between punctures 1 puncture diameter. Tergal discs 4–6 with similar, weaker sculpturing. Tergal marginal zones shiny, very superficially shagreened, with occasional extremely fine, inconspicuous punctures (Figs 11 D, 20 B). — Genitalia and hidden sterna: Gonocoxites with small, partly rounded dorsal lobes. Gonostyli simple, finger-shaped, slightly broadening apically, blade flattened, apical margin rounded. Penis valves moderately broad basally, parallel-sided close to visible base, then tapering apically (Fig. 20 N). Sternum 8 columnar, apical process as broad as stem, apical margin rounded. Distribution and habitat. Endemic to shrubland and sub-alpine habitats of the Troodos range in Cyprus, usually above 1200 m. Previous reports from the Levant (Pisanty et al. 2018; Wood et al. 2020) are reinterpreted as Andrena alshaykh sp. nov. Flight period. Late March to mid-June. Flower records. Collected from Brassicaceae (Alyssum) and Caryophyllaceae (Arenaria). Material examined. HOLOTYPE: CYPRUS ● ♀; Troodos, Chionistra [Mount Olympus]; 17 Jun. 1939; H. Lindberg leg.; MZHF. – PARATYPE: CYPRUS ● 1 ♀; ibid.; NHMUK. – non-type material: CYPRUS: ● 1 ♂; Finikária, Kyparissia Trail; 34.7775°N 33.1176°E; 530 m a. s. l.; 22 Mar. 2024; R. Santerre leg.; BOLD accession no. RSCMC 029-25; UMONS ● 1 ♀; Olympus Mount, S slope; 34.9265°N 32.8668°E; 1821 m a. s. l.; 3 May 2024; R. Santerre leg.; on Alyssum; UMONS ● 1 ♀; Olympus Mount, SE slope; 34.9332°N 32.8723°E; 1842 m a. s. l.; 3 May 2024; E. Ruelle leg.; on Alyssum; UMONS ● 1 ♂; Platres; 34.892– 7°N 32.861– 8°E; 10 Apr. 2023; G. Pisanty leg.; sweep; BOLD accession no. ANDCY 038-25; SMNHTAU 426966 ● 1 ♀; Troodos range, 0.7 km N Olympus Mt.; 34.9429°N 32.8653°E; 1828 m a. s. l.; 24 Apr. 2024; R. Santerre leg.; on Arenaria; ● 1 ♂; ibid.; BOLD accession no. RSCMC 030-25; UMONS ● 1 ♂; ibid.; BOLD accession no. RSCMC 031-25 ● 1 ♀; ibid.; TJWC ● 1 ♂; ibid.; flying.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.179 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Same topicPlant and animal studies→French-language works237,207→