MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7103880781 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.17511275

Andrena (Micrandrena) pandosa Warncke 1968

2025· article· W7103880781 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicMarine and coastal plant biology
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsParatypeHolotypeParaphernaliaPopulation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

3.1.4.3.Andrena(Micrandrena)pandosaWarncke, 1968 Figures 14 B, K, 19 D, F Andrena pandosa Warncke, 1968 b: 72, ♀ ♂ [Algeria: OLML]. Andrena pandosa ssp. excelsa Warncke, 1974 b: 14, 41, ♀ ♂ [Libya: OLML]. Andrena pandosa ssp. graciosa Warncke, 1993: 762, ♀ ♂ [Canary Islands: OLML]. Distribution and habitat. South Mediterranean. In the Levant, occurring in semi-arid to desert habitats in Israel, the West Bank and Jordan (Wood 2023 b). Flight period. Mid-February to early May. Flower preferences. Narrowly oligolectic on Reseda (Resedaceae) (Wood 2023 b). Also collected on Cistaceae and Malvaceae. Material examined. ISRAEL ● 1 ♀; Beersheba; 1 Apr. 19 [??]; H. Bytinski-Salz leg.; SMNHTAU ● 1 ♀; ibid.; 15 Apr. 1970; “ Andrena pandosa ssp. antigua War. ” paratype label ● 1 ♀; En Geddi; 2 Mar. [19] 71; ibid. ● 3 ♀; Jer [usalem?]; 2 May [19] 40; “ Andrena pandosa ssp. antigua War. ” paratype label; SMNHTAU ● 1 ♂; Jerusalem; 27 Mar. 1941; H. Bytinski-Salz leg.; SMNHTAU ● 1 ♀; ibid.; 1 Apr. 1941 ● 2 ♀, 1 ♂; ibid.; 7 Apr. 1947 ● 1 ♂; ibid.; 7 Mar. [19] 40; “ Andrena pandosa ssp. antigua War. ” paratype label ● 3 ♂; Jerusalem; 19 Apr. 1953; J. Wahrman leg.; cave; SMNHTAU ● 1 ♂; ibid.; 19 Apr. 1945; “ Andrena pandosa ssp. antigua War. ” paratype label ● 1 ♀; Jerusalem, Mt. Scopus; 2 May 1940; “ Andrena pandosa ssp. antigua War. ” paratype label; SMNHTAU ● 1 ♀, 7 ♂; ibid.; 19 Apr. 1945 ● 1 ♂; on Malva sylvestris ● 1 ♀; Ma’agar Yeroham, NW, Nahal Revivim; 460 m a. s. l.; 5 Apr. 2017; L. Friedman leg; SMNHTAU 270759 ● 1 ♀; Mishor Rotem; 15 Mar. [19] 66; M. Weichselfish leg.; SMNHTAU ● 1 ♂; ibid.; 7 Mar. [19] 65; on Helianthemum stipulatum; SMNHTAU 367690 ● 1 ♀; Ramon; 10 Mar. 1974; D. Furth leg.; SMNHTAU 367689 ● 1 ♂; Tel ‘ Eton; 31.492°N 34.925°E; 3 Apr. 2022; G. Pisanty leg.; sweeping; SMNHTAU 388466. – JORDAN ● 1 ♂; S of Irbid; 13 Apr. 2009; M. Snižek leg.; TJWC ● 1 ♀; 10 km N, NE of Jarash [Jerash]; 20 Apr. 2002; ibid. ● 1 ♀; 15 km W Jerash, Dibbin; 2 May 2006; K. Deneš leg.; TJWC ● 5 ♀; 15 km E of Petra; 26 Apr. 2008; K. Deneš leg.; OLML ● 2 ♀; ibid.; TJWC. – WEST BANK ● 1 ♂; Avenat, Nahal Mazin, Rt. 90; 31°40’49”N 35°26’26”E; – 375 m a. s. l.; 18 Feb. 2020; G. Pisanty leg.; BOLD accession no. ANDIL 321-22; SMNHTAU 332871 ● 1 ♂; ‘ Enot Zuqim; 31°43’N 35°27’E; – 400 m a. s. l.; 9 Feb. 2012; A. Freidberg leg.; SMNHTAU 117880 ● 2 ♀, 1 ♂; Har-Gilo; 14 Apr. 1991; R. Kasher leg.; 10 min sweeping; SMNHTAU ● 5 ♀, 11 ♂; ibid.; 17 Apr. 1991 ● 1 ♂; Har Gilo, 5 km SW Jerusalem; 29 Mar. [19] 88; C. O’Toole leg.; swept from Anthemis - Trigonella - Trifolium patch; SMNHTAU 207217 ● 2 ♀, 17 ♂; Har-Gilo, 5 km SW Jerusalem; 850 m a. s. l.; 11 Apr. 1990; R. Kasher leg.; SMNHTAU ● 4 ♀, 2 ♂; ibid.; 21 Apr. 1990 ● 1 ♀, 2 ♂; ibid.; 25 Apr. 1990 ● 2 ♀; ibid.; 27 Apr. 1990 ● 1 ♀; ibid.; 29 Apr. 1990 ● 1 ♀; ibid.; 7 May 1990 ● 1 ♀; ibid.; 8 May 1990 ● 1 ♀; Har Gilo, 5 km SW of Jerusalem; 850 m a. s. l.; 12 May 1991; C. O’Toole leg.; At Reseda lutea; SMNHTAU ● 1 ♀; Jericho WQ [Wadi Qelt]; 6 Apr. [19] 71; H. Bytinski-Salz leg.; “ Andrena pandosa ssp. antigua War. ” paratype label; SMNHTAU ● 3 ♀, 23 ♂; Judea, Har Gilo; 19 Apr. 1988; R. Leys leg.; RMNH ZMA.INS.5104047 ● 1 ♂; Nahal Qidron, Avenat, Rt. 90; 2 Mar. 2010; L. Friedman leg.; SMNHTAU 52576 ● 1 ♀; Qalya; 31.75°N 35.462°E; 2 Mar. 2021; G. Pisanty leg.; BOLD accession no. ANDIL 351-22; SMNHTAU 357553.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.052

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Same topicMarine and coastal plant biology→French-language works237,207→