MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7103885017 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.17511184

Andrena (Micrandrena) leptura Warncke 1974, stat. nov.

2025· article· W7103885017 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicMediterranean and Iberian flora and fauna
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSubspeciesTaxonHabitatDesert (philosophy)Animal ecology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

3.1.1.5.Andrena(Micrandrena)lepturaWarncke, 1974 stat. nov. Andrena mariana ssp. leptura Warncke, 1974 b: 13, 40, ♀ ♂ [Egypt: OLML]. Distribution and habitat. Desert habitats in the south-east Mediterranean. Newly reported from the Levant *, in southern Israel *. Flight period. Mid-January to mid-April. Flower records. Collected from Brassicaceae (Diplotaxis, Zilla). Remarks. Molecular barcodes strongly suggest that this taxon is distinct (Fig. 1), and we hereby elevate it to species status. All subspecies of Andrena mariana erected by Warncke are now considered distinct at the species level (Wood 2023 a and the present work). See Andrena kugleri sp. nov. for a discussion of morphological differences among members of this group. Material examined. ISRAEL ● 2 ♀, 1 ♂; Arava, 4 km W of Hazeva; 19–29 Feb. 1988; R. Leys leg.; RMNH ● 1 ♀; ibid.; TJWC ● 1 ♀; Gerofit; 11 Mar. 1974; D. Furth leg.; SMNHTAU ● 1 ♀; Hazeva; 8 Feb. 2009; A. Gotlieb leg.; SMNHTAU 27043 ● 1 ♂; ibid.; 11 Feb. 2009; SMNHTAU 27078 ● 1 ♀; ibid.; 10 Mar. 2009; SMNHTAU 27290 ● 1 ♂; ibid.; SMNHTAU 27287 ● 1 ♂; ibid.; 13 Feb. 2010; on Zilla spinosa; SMNHTAU 57444 ● 3 ♀; Hazeva Field School; 30°43’N 35°15’E; 12 Mar. 1998; E. Askenazi leg.; Malaise trap; SMNHTAU ● 1 ♀; Iddan; 12 Mar. 2009; A. Gotlieb leg.; SMNHTAU 27440 ● 1 ♀; Makhtésh Ramon; 6 Apr. 1997; L. Friedman leg.; SMNHTAU ● 1 ♂; Nahal ‘ Ashosh, Rt. 90; 30°31.2’N 35°10.9’E; 22 m a. s. l.; 17 Feb. 2015; A. Freidberg leg.; BOLD accession no. ANDIL 185-22; SMNHTAU 205081 ● 1 ♀; Nahal Gidron, 2.5 Km W Arava Hwy (90); 9 Mar. 1998; E. Ashkenazi leg.; SMNHTAU ● 1 ♀; Nahal Nemiyya, Rt. 90; 30°40.5’N 35°13.1’E; – 62 m a. s. l.; 8 Mar. 2010; A. Freidberg leg.; SMNHTAU 48066 ● 2 ♀; Nahal Sayif; 30.855°N 35.260°E; 13 Feb. 2016; G. Pisanty leg.; on Brassicaceae; SMNHTAU 234090, 234091 ● 1 ♀; ibid.; BOLD accession no. ANDIL 218-22; SMNHTAU 234093 ● 4 ♂; ibid.; SMNHTAU 234094 to 234097 ● 1 ♀; Nahal Shahaq; 30°48’N 35°14’E; 22 Mar. 1998; E. Ashkenazi leg.; Malaise trap; SMNHTAU ● 1 ♀; Nahal Shahaq, Shezaf Nat. Res.; 30°44.83’N 35°15.10’E; 9 Mar. 1997; O. Niehuis leg.; SMNHTAU ● 8 ♀, 3 ♂; ibid.; 10 Mar. 1997 ● 2 ♀; ibid.; 30°44.16’N 35°14.51’E; 10 Mar. 1997; Malaise trap ● 1 ♀, 2 ♂; Nahal Shahaq, Shezaf Nat. Res.; 30°45.08’N 35°15.33’E; – 120 m a. s. l.; 19 Feb. 1997; O. Niehuis leg.; SMNHTAU ● 2 ♀, 4 ♂; ibid.; 30°45.39’N 35°15.58’E; 27 Feb. 1997 ● 1 ♀, 5 ♂; ibid.; 30°44.26’N 35°14.58’E; 2 Mar. 1997 ● 13 ♀, 6 ♂; ibid.; 4 Mar. 1997 ● 5 ♀; ibid.; I. Yarom leg. ● 3 ♀; Nahal Shezaf; 30.722°N 35.270°E; 14 Feb. 2016; G. Pisanty leg.; on Brassicaceae; SMNHTAU 234071 to 234073; ● 1 ♂; ibid.; SMNHTAU 234070 ● 1 ♀; Nahal Shezaf NR; – 134 m a. s. l.; 30 Mar. 2011; A. Dorchin leg.; TJWC ● 1 ♀; NahalNizzana, Rt. 171; 750 m a. s. l.; 2 Apr. 2014; A. Freidberg leg.; SMNHTAU 178619 ● 1 ♂; Ramon; 10 Mar. 1974; D. Furth leg.; SMNHTAU ● 2 ♀; Ramon Rd.; 11 Mar. 1974; D. Furth leg.; SMNHTAU ● 1 ♂; Shizzafon; 30.0435°N 35.023°E; 27 Feb. 2015; G. Pisanty leg.; SMNHTAU 205469 ● 2 ♀; Wadi Segur, 40 km NW Eilat; 17 Apr. 1990; Warncke leg.; OLML ● 1 ♀; Yotvata (Hay Bar) Nature Reserve; 27 Feb. 2015; G. Pisanty leg.; on Brassicaceae; SMNHTAU 205518 ● 1 ♀; Zofar; 12 Mar. 2009; H. Carmely leg.; SMNHTAU 27883 ● 1 ♀; Zofar; 13 Mar. 2009; G. Pisanty leg.; on Zilla spinosa; SMNHTAU 27800.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.078

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0230.017

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicMediterranean and Iberian flora and faunaFrench-language works237,207